The CJEU examines 'genuine use' of the Green Dot 'recycling’ collective trade mark

Consumers are likely to be influenced to purchase goods where the packaging can be disposed of in an environmentally sound way, thus creating or maintaining a market share relating to those goods

30 January 2020

A collective trade mark indicates that the goods and services displaying the mark originate from members of a particular association. The collective trade mark in this case was Der Grune Punkt - Duales System Deutschland GmbH’s ('DGP') 'Der Grüne Punkt' trade mark (the 'Green Dot'). The mark consists of two curved arrows forming a circle (either in black and white or two shades of green). It originally covered a wide range of goods and services from beverages, industrial products, advertising and transport. The purpose of the mark was to indicate to consumers that the packaging was included in the collective mark owner’s recycling system and to distinguish them from other goods and services.

In 2012, the EUIPO revoked all rights connected to the mark for all goods expect those specifically for packaging, for lack of genuine use. DGP filed an appeal to the EUIPO Board of Appeal and later the General Court. The appeals were dismissed on the basis that DGP had failed to provide proof that the mark was being used to guarantee the origin of the goods themselves and that consumers did not associate the mark with the packaged goods themselves.

The CJEU’s judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union ('CJEU') set aside the judgment of the General Court and annulled the decision of the EUIPO Board of Appeal. The CJEU confirmed the approach to examining genuine use of a collective mark which looks at:

  • Whether use of the mark in the particular sector created or maintained a share in the market for the goods and services protected by the mark
  • The nature of those goods or services
  • The characteristics of the market
  • The scale and frequency of use of the mark.

The CJEU commented that with regards to some types of goods which, by their nature, result in daily packaging waste (e.g. food, drinks, personal care and housekeeping products), a consumer could be influenced by the association of the mark with the recycling system and the environmentally-friendly disposal of the packaging. The CJEU concluded that it cannot be said that the mark did not contribute to preserving an outlet for the goods themselves (i.e. the presence of the Green Dot mark on the packaging might influence the consumer’s buying decision of that particular product).

Summary

This case highlights the importance of examining the use of a collective mark in the context of the sector with which it is associated. In this case, the court recognised the apparent shift in consumer purchasing patterns towards environmentally-friendly packaging for products.

How can Burges Salmon help?

If you would like to discuss any of the issues raised in this article or would like any further information, please contact Jeremy Dickerson, Emily Roberts or your usual intellectual property team contact. 

A link to the judgment can be found here.

Key contact

Jeremy Dickerson

Jeremy Dickerson Partner

  • Head of International 
  • Head of Intellectual Property, Media and Sport
  • Defamation and Reputation Management

Subscribe to news and insight

Burges Salmon careers

We work hard to make sure Burges Salmon is a great place to work.
Find out more