The not so artful dodger: art dealer ordered to draw maximum pension sums to pay creditors

This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
This article was written by Justin Briggs and Sara Charteris-Black.
Click here for more detail on this case, including an explanation of the Court’s reasoning.
Summary
In the recent Court of Appeal decision Bacci v Green [2022] EWCA Civ 1393 the Court, upholding the decision of the High Court, held that a judgment debtor can be ordered to delegate authority to waive valuable tax protection and draw pension where doing so would enable creditors to extract what they were owed.
The Facts
In 2017, Matthew Green, son of established Mayfair art dealer Richard Green, committed fraud in obtaining loans from FundingSecure.
Mr Green was subsequently declared bankrupt with the result that most of his assets fell into his bankrupt estate. However, given the public policy of protecting pension rights in bankruptcy, Mr Green’s right to a pension from age 55 was excluded from falling into his bankrupt estate (s. 11 Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999).
Mr Green’s interest in his pension scheme - which included a share of a prime piece of property in Mayfair, last valued at £55 million - was well in excess of the judgment debt. The issue for his creditors was how to extract what they were owed from his pension in the face of:
The creditors applied for injunctive relief under section 37(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981, which provides that the High Court may grant an injunction or appoint a receiver where it is just and convenient to do so.
The specific orders sought by the creditors were for Mr Green to delegate to their solicitors:
The intention was that the pension payments and the two lump sums would be paid into one of Mr Green’s UK bank accounts (nominated by the creditors). At that point the creditors would enforce their judgment in the normal way, via a third party debt order, requiring the bank to pay those sums to the creditors.
The Decision
The High Court made the orders sought by the creditors, and Mr Green appealed the decision.
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the High Court, finding that:
Takeaways
Fraudsters should be under no illusions that they will be able to cling on to valuable pension benefits, as this case demonstrates just how creative the Court is willing to be when exercising its section 37(1) jurisdiction. This creative approach may come to favour liquidators as it suggests there is scope for looking beyond assets in the debtor’s control and to assets that the debtor may be entitled to in future.
The Court of Appeal in Bacci v Green orders a debtor to delegate authority to waive valuable tax protection and draw pension to satisfy a judgment debt