Thought leadership
Arbitration under the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991 – mandatory or not?
26 February 2026
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
As anticipated, the Court of Appeal decision in Rees v Earl of Plymouth (in which we acted for the landlord) is attracting some commentary and attention in the agricultural press and on social media.
I was interested to see the recent article in Farmers Weekly. While it is always tricky to get the full picture and background just from the judgment and the article necessarily makes some assumptions which are not entirely accurate, I would endorse the comments reportedly made by George Dunn of the TFA - common sense is key. In our view, the Court of Appeal’s decision helps to confirm that a common sense approach is critically important when interpreting a lease.
I also agree that - for parties entering into a lease - ensuring it is clear and that they are advised up front is very sensible and will avoid issues longer term.
The Court of Appeal’s decision effectively requires the parties to a lease to consider its terms in the round and from a common-sense perspective - George Dunn, TFA
Want more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us