Thought leadership
Filling the Gaps? HM Treasury Consults on Appointed Representatives Regime
3 April 2026
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Written by Ebony Ezekwesili
On 2 November 2020, the Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in the Financial Conduct Authority’s test case on business interruption insurance relating to the coronavirus pandemic lockdown. The hearing will begin on 16 November 2020 and is expected to last four days.
The FCA launched the test case to determine whether a representative sample of eight insurance companies with various policy wordings covering business interruption would have to pay out claims to businesses that were forced to close as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown in March. The High Court analysed three types of policy wordings, primarily “in the event of a notifiable disease within a specified radius”, “when insured premises cannot be accessed because of public authority restrictions”, and a combination of the two.
Six insurers and a policyholder action group have joined the FCA in appealing the judgment handed down by the High Court on 15 September 2020, which mostly ruled in favour of the policyholders. The appeal seeks to clarify whether the policy wordings cover the business interruption caused by the first lockdown in March. A decision is likely to impact hundreds of types of policies, 60 insurers, and 370,000 policyholders, resulting in billions in claims.
Want more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us