Thought leadership
TPO cases in review - express clarification of difference in approach to FOS
27 March 2026
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Written by Harrison Folland
On 21 April, the Financial Markets Law Committee (“FMLC”) published a letter sent to HM Treasury in relation to the topic of the International Platform on Sustainable Finance (“IPSF”).
The FMLC describes the IPSF as "a forum for public authorities in charge of
developing sustainable finance policies/initiatives to help investors contribute to
climate and environmental objectives. The IPSF aims to provide a forum to allow
members to share best practices, compare initiatives and identify barriers to, and
opportunities for, sustainable finance". HM Treasury announced that the UK had joined the IPSF in February of this year.
Potential risk and regulatory uncertainty
As well as offering congratulations to HM Treasury on its participation in IPSF, the letter outlines the FMLC's concerns surrounding the potential for divergence between sustainable finance standards adopted between the EU and the UK.
In particular, the FMLC is concerned with post-Brexit divergence in respect of:
Certain operative provisions of the above regimes became applicable from 10 March 2021. Separately, further specific periodic disclosure requirements will take effect from 1 January 2022; two further sets of requirements, concerned with areas such as climate mitigation objectives, will then come into force in 2022 and 2023 respectively.
However, the operative disclosure obligations in respect of the above regimes were not retained in UK law following the end of the Brexit transition period at 11 pm on 31 December 2020.
As such, the FMLC considers that there is a risk posed by the fact that the UK has not clarified its approach to implementing and amending these EU measures following the decision not to onshore their relevant provisions.
Next steps?
The letter ends with the FMLC's suggestion to:
"[use] either an approach which takes into account E.U. standards (but potentially enhancing detailed disclosure requirements at Level 2, where appropriate) or an outcomes-based approach which is consistent with the direction of travel in the E.U. and beyond, to avoid regulatory conflict"
Finally, the FMLC has urged HM Treasury to provide additional clarity on the approach it intends to take towards the "SFDR and other pieces of legislation" post-Brexit.
Want more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us