Strengthening Consumer Rights: new EU rules proposed to promote out-of-court dispute resolution

This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
A look at the EU’s proposed reforms to make alternative dispute resolution more accessible and effective for consumers and traders
In June 2025, the European Parliament and the Council of the EU, together with the European Commission, reached a provisional agreement to modernise the EU’s framework for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in consumer disputes. The proposed directive aims to clarify the ADR framework in place across the EU and, assuming it is published, will introduce a series of reforms aimed at making ADR more accessible, transparent, and effective for both consumers and traders.
These developments are part of a broader global trend towards promoting negotiated, out-of-court solutions to disputes.
In this context, “alternative dispute resolution” (ADR) refers to impartial, out-of-court processes - such as mediation, arbitration, ombudsman services, and complaints boards - which help consumers and businesses resolve disputes fairly, efficiently, and at low cost.
The EU already had some rules in place dealing with consumer rights and ADR under a previous 2013 Directive (2013/11-EN-EUR-Lex). The proposed new directive seeks to modernise and clarify this framework to reflect the realities of the digital economy and associated cross-border commerce.
The main changes are:
Trader participation remains voluntary unless required by national law.
However, Member states are expected to promote ADR through:
The revised directive expands the ADR framework to cover:
Traders must respond to ADR requests within 20 working days—or 30 days for complex cases. If no response is received, the silence is treated as a refusal to engage, establishing a clear expectation of timely participation.
To improve efficiency and transparency:
The agreement will now proceed through the final legislative stages:
Although the UK is no longer a member of the EU, these reforms are highly relevant for:
Voluntary participation in ADR schemes may offer a competitive edge, particularly as consumer expectations and regulatory standards continue to evolve. This reflects a more general trend towards the active encouragement of engagement in ADR, and the increasing prospect of criticism and delay to litigation where parties are unreasonably refusing to do so.
Burges Salmon’s leading Dispute Resolution team works collaboratively with our clients to resolve complex commercial and cross-border disputes. We are closely monitoring these developments and their implications. For tailored advice on dispute resolution strategy, please contact Elizabeth Pouget, Caroline Brown, Justin Briggs, or your usual contact in our Dispute Resolution team.
Parliament’s rapporteur Laura Ballarín Cereza (S&D, ES) said: “The revision of the ADR directive represents a significant step forward for consumer rights.”