The Tragedy (and Triumph) of EMI Options: Why We Keep Saying the Same Thing

This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Let’s be honest: EMI options are boring.
There, I said it.
And yet, somehow, we just can’t stop talking about them. Every month brings another webinar, another LinkedIn post, another article (guilty as charged). All covering the same greatest hits:
Sound familiar? Of course it does.
If you’ve ever sat through an EMI presentation, you already know the format. It starts with a joke about EMI being a “no-brainer for tech start-ups” (groan). Then comes a slide titled “Common Pitfalls” – and a grave warning about paperwork. We nod along. We’ve seen it before. We’ll see it again.
And we’ll all pretend it’s new information.
Because it works.
Despite predictions of its demise at every Budget, EMI survives. It’s bulletproof. Reform-proof. Scandal-proof. It’s been around longer than most of the startups it supports.
And that’s the problem. Reliability isn’t sexy. EMI isn’t the next big thing. It’s the old faithful. The Honda Civic of tax-efficient incentives. A little dull… but incredibly effective.
Because people still keep messing it up.
Even now, someone is:
So we keep reminding people. Not because it’s new. But because it’s still going wrong.
Yes, EMI is boring. But it’s boring because it’s brilliant. It unlocks huge value. It helps early-stage companies attract talent. It’s survived every tax policy change thrown at it.
And it delivers. Clean exits. Low tax. Happy founders. Motivated employees.
So the next time you’re tempted to roll your eyes at yet another EMI update, remember:
📣 Someone still hasn’t complied with their EMI reporting obligations.
Be kind. Repeat yourself.