Another furnished holiday cottage business fails to get BPR
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
The First Tier Tribunal case of the Executors of the estate of the late Gertrud Tanner is another example of a holiday cottage business which has failed to qualify for BPR from Inheritance Tax because none of the additional services were sufficient to take the business over the “non- investment line”.
The taxpayer argued that the leading case of Pawson had become dysfunctional. But the tribunal's view was that if that was the case, then it was for the higher courts or Parliament to deal with. The non-legal member of the tribunal expressed regret that the case law on this aspect of BPR “has strayed from the apparent purpose of the underlying legislation”.
As the law currently stands, the decision will come as no surprise to watchers of the long line of similar cases.
Executors for the estate of the late Gertrud Tanner (TC9456)
As the law currently stands the decision will come as no surprise to watchers of the long line of similar cases.
https://assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukftt/tc/2025/328/ukftt_tc_2025_328.pdf
Want more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us