Employment Edit: 16 April 2026
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
Last week, the government responded to its consultation into the right of trade unions to access workplaces. Under that new right, which is set to come into force in October this year, unions can seek access to a workplace for the purposes of meeting, recruiting or organising workers or facilitating collective bargaining. Access rights will be set out in enforceable ‘access agreements’, with such agreements either agreed between the employer and trade union or, where the union and employer are unable to agree, being determined by the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC).
In its consultation response, the government outlined several features of the planned statutory framework for access agreements. These include that:
In welcome news for employers, the government intends to implement longer time-periods for handling access requests than the very tight timeframes it had proposed in the original consultation. The employer will now have 15 working days within which to respond to an access request (up from 5 working days) and, if the request is rejected, the parties will have 25 working days within which to negotiate (up from 15 working days). If either party wishes to refer the matter to the CAC, this will need to be done within 55 working days (up from 25 working days) of the access request being made. Further details on the timeframes and process for requesting access are set out in the draft code of practice on trade union right of access, which was published alongside the consultation response.
Read moreOne of the ERA 2025 measures aimed at tackling workplace harassment and discrimination is a ban on the use of certain non-disclosure and confidentiality clauses. Under this ban, clauses or agreements between employers and workers that purport to prevent the worker from making disclosures relating to harassment or discrimination or the employer’s response to such harassment or discrimination will be void.
The ERA provides that “excepted agreements” will not be subject to this ban, but what will constitute an “excepted agreement” will be detailed in secondary legislation. Yesterday, the government launched consultation seeking feedback on its proposed criteria for “excepted agreements” (including a requirement for independent advice on the terms and effect of the agreement and a proposed “cooling off period” within which the worker can choose to withdraw from the agreement), as well as the individuals and bodies that workers who sign excepted agreements will still be able to speak to regardless of what is said in the agreement. On our ERA hub, we have explored the proposed criteria in more detail and considered what excepted agreements could mean for employers.
Read moreOne of the commitments made by the Labour party in its Plan to Make Work Pay was to “strengthen the existing set of rights and protections for workers subject to TUPE processes”. To inform the TUPE reform options that the government intends to draw up, it has now published a call for evidence on the TUPE Regulations.
The government is seeking input on a range of TUPE-related topics, including:
The call for evidence will close on 1 July 2026.
Read the call for evidenceThe EAT has held that an employer who withdrew an accepted job offer was in breach of contract when it terminated the contract without giving reasonable notice.
The candidate was offered a project manager role, subject to receipt of satisfactory references and a right-to-work check. The offer letter did not provide any details about the notice period required to terminate the employment. The candidate accepted the offer and provided referee details and electronic right-to-work documents. A few days later, the employer withdrew the offer due to a delay in the underlying project. The claimant brought a claim for breach of contract.
The tribunal found that there was no binding contract in place as satisfactory references had not yet been received and the right to work checks were incomplete until original documents had been provided. The EAT disagreed – based on its analysis of the offer letter, the EAT found that the conditions in the offer were “conditions subsequent”. This meant that a contract was formed once the offer letter was accepted and, if the conditions were then not met, the contract could be terminated. The EAT implied a term into the offer letter requiring reasonable notice to be given on termination. Given the seniority of the role, the lengthy recruitment process and the employee’s planned relocation, three months’ notice was reasonable. The case underlines the importance of carefully drafting offer letters to ensure that any conditions of the offer are clear and to set out the notice period that would apply in the event of any conditions not being met.
(Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems Ltd)
21 April 2026 | 12-1pm
Luke Bowery and Kate Redshaw are delighted to join the CBI (where Kate has been on secondment to the Future of Work & Skills team) for this practical webinar discussing what the ERA reforms to unfair dismissal mean for employers. Open to CBI members and non-members, you can register here.
Register20 May 2026 | 5-7.30pm
Join Burges Salmon, in association with HeyFlow and Women in Football, for an in‑person session exploring how the ERA reforms will reshape employment, compliance and workforce expectations across football. Carlene Nicol and Elizabeth Buckley from our Employment team will be sharing key updates and insights on these reforms.
RSVPApril saw a raft of ERA changes coming into force – from expanded statutory sick pay entitlement and new ‘day one’ family-leave rights, through to important changes to the statutory recognition process for trade unions and an increase to the protective award for failure to inform and consult in collective redundancy scenarios. In this article (a version of which was first published by Reward and Benefits Association), Luke Bowery and Kate Redshaw run through what has changed and what it means for employers.
Read more
Based on insights from over 400 decision makers, our Beyond Digital Adoption report uncovers the biggest pressures and opportunities shaping digital transformation across key themes including AI, data, cybersecurity, workforce and infrastructure.
Explore the full reportWant more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us