Employment Edit: 29 October 2026
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
From tomorrow, trade unions will have a new statutory right to seek access (digital and/or physical) to workplaces for the purpose of meeting, supporting, representing, recruiting and organising workers, and facilitating collective bargaining. Importantly, a union will be able to make a request for access even where it is not recognised by the employer and has little or no existing membership or presence within the workforce.
Below we explain how we can help your organisation adapt to these reforms, and where you can find more information.
There is a lot for employers to think about in light of these new access rights. Some of the points to consider are practical, such as who will co-ordinate your response to any request and what would access look like in practice for your organisation. However, much of the thinking at this stage is focussed on broader strategic issues, such as how any request would impact on your wider industrial relations strategy and whether you want to proactively explore access prior to any request being received.
We can help you work through these strategic questions, as well helping you get on top of the nuts and bolts of access request readiness. If we can help your organisation, please contact Luke Bowery or your usual employment team contact.
In this guide, we explain what constitutes “access”, how trade unions can make a request, how employers can respond, and how the new regime will be enforced. Our recent webinar, in which we walked through the new regime and considered what it means for employers, is also now available on demand. Or, if an at-a-glance update is more your thing, then look no further than this blog post.
Two important anti-harassment changes take effect tomorrow:
Below we explain how we can help your organisation adapt to these reforms, and where you can find more information.
Whilst the priority should be reviewing and updating your risk assessment, that alone is unlikely to be sufficient to satisfy your obligations under these harassment prevention rules. To meet the higher bar of “all” reasonable steps and to address the broader risk of third-party harassment, you will need to consider, identify, and implement further practical steps to prevent harassment. What these steps will look like will depend on your workforce and ways of working. If we can help your organisation work through these questions, please contact Katherine Flower or your usual employment team contact.
We have a host of resources exploring the implications of the expansion of the duty to prevent sexual harassment and the new third party harassment claim:
For all the latest news and analysis of the measures covered in yesterday’s budget (including National Minimum Wage updates, a new Parental Allowance for self-employed parents and reform of non-compete clauses), visit our dedicated hub for the Autumn Budget 2026.
Visit our hubThe ERA enables the government to introduce new protections relating to dismissals during pregnancy or family-related leave or after such leave but, until last week, it was not clear what those new protections would look like and exactly who would be protected. Last week, the government provided more detail on this significant new protection in its consultation response.
It plans to introduce a new “day one” protection for:
The new rules will raise the bar for dismissals of protected employees – where an employer dismisses a protected employee, it will need to justify that dismissal as a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”. This means the employer will have to identify a genuine business interest that it is furthering by dismissing the employee and show that the dismissal is proportionate. This latter point in effect requires the employer to show that there are no less-discriminatory alternatives (e.g. a warning, redeployment, or changes to the employee’s duties) that would also achieve the legitimate aim. Read more about what this means for employers on our ERA hub page below.
Read moreIn other important ERA news, the government issued several updates last week relating to its reform of “fire and rehire” or changing terms and conditions of employment. By way of a reminder, under these reforms, a dismissal will be automatically unfair if the reason for the dismissal was either because the employee did not agree to a “restricted variation” of their contract of employment or in order to re-engage them or replace them with someone else to carry out substantially the same duties under a varied contract of employment (including at least one “restricted variation”).
In the response to its consultation into the scope of “restricted variations”, the government provided the following important updates:
The government also launched consultation into a draft updated Code of Practice on dismissal and re-engagement, with a view to the new Code being introduced in summer 2027. You can read more about this reform on our ERA hub page below.yment, or changes to the employee’s duties) that would also achieve the legitimate aim. Read more about what this means for employers on our ERA hub page below.
Read moreWant to know more about the Employment Rights Act 2025? Our hub is a treasure trove of practical employer resources.
Visit the hubWe will use your contact details to send you emails about the latest Employment news, thought leadership and events.
Sign up nowWant more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us