Which AI risks matter the most?
This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
The MIT AI risk repository asked 272 international experts which AI risks matter most, how severe they could become, and who is responsible for addressing them.
Experts included AI risk and governance practitioners from financial services and other large corporates, AI safety experts at AI Safety Institutes, academics, and AI policymakers from national governments.
The key findings included:
The report is also useful as it allows readers to interact with data, visualising it by sector, risk, and actor.
The report comes hot on the heels of a report on how UK public companies report on AI adoption, risks and harms. The reports appear complementary; for example, there is an increasing trend in public companies reporting cyber security concerns related to AI (and the underlying data allows you to see which companies are reporting that) and the MIT report identifies which sectors are affected by those risks, with healthcare, financial services, and national security facing ‘extreme’ vulnerability.
If you would like to discuss how current or future regulations impact what you do with AI, please contact Tom Whittaker, Brian Wong, Lucy Pegler, Martin Cook, Liz Griffiths or any other member in our Technology team. For the latest on AI law and regulation, see our blog and newsletter.
Want more Burges Salmon content? Add us as a preferred source on Google to your favourites list for content and news you can trust.
Update your preferred sourcesBe sure to follow us on LinkedIn and stay up to date with all the latest from Burges Salmon.
Follow us